Tools named · 4 decisions · 4 courts

AI-hallucinated citation decisions naming Grok

4 decisions and docket orders whose text names Grok, 2025 to 2026, from 4 courts. A record is here when the documents on file contain the name Grok. It is a fact about the text: the court or a party named the tool. It does not say the tool was the cause.

Retrieved from CourtListener public records.

Every record, newest first

Grok · 4 records
DateCaseCourtStateThe text mentionsSource
Withers v. City of Aberdeen No. 1:24-cv-00218N.D. Miss.MississippiChatGPT, Google (search or AI overview), Grok, a referral to a bar or disciplinary bodyCourtListener
Byoplanet International v. Knecht No. 0:25-cv-60646S.D. Fla.FloridaChatGPT, Claude, CoCounsel, CopilotCourtListener
Noland v. Land of the Free No. B331918Cal. Ct. App.CaliforniaChatGPT, Claude, Gemini / Bard, GrokCourtListener
United States v. Chaabani No. 3:24-cr-02713S.D. Cal.CaliforniaChatGPT, Grok, Lexis+ AI, dismissalCourtListener

The whole record of court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations, or what a citation gate is, the mechanism that keeps a cite from reaching a court unopened.

Show me on one of my files →

Every decision here is about a cite nobody opened. See a cite checked before it renders, on your own file.

Show me on my files