Connecticut · 2 courts

AI-hallucinated citation decisions in Connecticut

4 decisions and docket orders, 2025 to 2026, from 2 courts in Connecticut, in which a court addressed authority that did not exist. Each links the court's own words and the source document.

Retrieved from CourtListener public records.

Courts in Connecticut

Every record, newest first

Connecticut · 4 records
DateCaseCourtThe text mentionsSource
In re: Booker No. 3:25-cv-01205D. Conn.ChatGPT, Gemini / Bard, Perplexity, a warning or admonitionCourtListener
TOV Realty v. Suarez No. SC21183Conn.ChatGPT, a referral to a bar or disciplinary body, continuing legal education, Rule 11CourtListener
Andre v. Warden No. 3:24-cv-01295D. Conn.a warning or admonition, a certification about AI use, dismissal, a self-represented partyCourtListener
Cojom v. Roblen No. 3:23-cv-01669D. Conn.ChatGPT, Harvey, continuing legal education, a self-represented partyCourtListener

The whole record of court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations. For what courts and bars in Connecticut require of a filing with AI in it, see the court AI orders tracker.

Show me on one of my files →

Every decision here is about a cite nobody opened. See a cite checked before it renders, on your own file.

Show me on my files