ApodictaShow me on my files

Colorado · state appellate court · 2016

People Ex Rel. C.J.R.

Colorado Court of Appeals, 8 September 2016. What the court wrote about citations that did not exist, in its own words, from the document on file.

Case record · Colo. Ct. App.

  1. Court. Colorado Court of AppealsCOURT
  2. Level. state appellate courtLEVEL
  3. Date. 8 September 2016DATED
  4. Docket. No. Court of Appeals 16CA0915DOCKET
  5. Judge. Berger, Román, BernardJUDGE
  6. Reporter. 2016 COA 133; 409 P.3d 536CITE
  7. Documents. one document, 2 passages quoted belowON FILE
  8. Source. CourtListenerSOURCE

Retrieved · the text below was read from the source documents on that day.

What the court wrote

The passages in which the court addresses the fabricated authority, verbatim, by document. A bracketed ellipsis marks where a passage was cut for length; nothing else is changed.

Published opinion, 8 September 2016 · source · PDF · 52 pages

Culwell, Lakewood, Colorado, for Respondent- Appellant 1 ¶ 1 This case requires us to decide whether the Denver Probate Court had the authority to order the involuntary administration of a drug to “chemically castrate” 1 C.J.R., a person civilly committed to a state hospital. We hold that absent legislative authority, which does not exist, the probate court has no such authority. Therefore, we reverse the portion of the probate court’s order authorizing the involuntary administration of the drug Depo-Provera.

Facts and Procedural History ¶ 2 C.J.R. is a long-term patient at the Colorado Mental Health Institute at Fort Logan (state hospital), where he has been treated for a schizoaffective disorder, which is a form of psychosis. Manifestations of his illness include hallucinations about dead babies and the belief that his food and his medicine are 1 The term “chemical castration” has been used by a number of courts and other authorities to describe the use of the drug Depo- Provera on men to control their sexual desires and behavior. See, e.g., People v.

What the text mentions

Pattern matches on the documents' text. Each line is a fact that the text contains the words, not a finding about the case.

Where this fits

This page is a record, not legal advice. It quotes the documents on file and lists what their text mentions. Read the decision at the source before relying on it, and check whether a later order changed it.

More from Colorado Court of Appeals, from Colorado, or from 2016. The whole record is at court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations.

Every case in this record shares one cause: a citation reached a court without anyone opening it. What a citation gate is explains the mechanism that makes that impossible by construction; how to check an AI citation in five minutes is the manual version; the sanctions record is the essay this table grew out of.

Show me on one of my files →

This case is about a cite nobody opened. See a cite checked against the record before it renders, on your own file.

Show me on one of my filesTry the gate
Show me on my files