Published opinion, 9 July 2026 · source · PDF · 21 pages
It did not seek to seal any of Vendera’s motion, supplements, or attachments. Presumably, the Juneau Group believed that the motion to strike would address those documents. _____________________ 1 For simplicity’s sake, we refer to this motion as the “Rule 35 motion.” 2 The motion to strike contained artificial-intelligence-hallucinated caselaw, which the district court described as “an attempt to perpetrate a fraud on th[e] [c]ourt.” Case: 25-20258 Document: 107-1 Page: 4 Date Filed: 07/09/2026 No. 25-20258 5 While those motions were pending, BOKF moved for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c), and Vendera joined in the motion.