Pennsylvania · federal district court
AI-hallucinated citation decisions: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
4 decisions and docket orders from this court, 2025 to 2026, in which the court addressed authority that did not exist. 4 carry a page with the court's words quoted; the rest link straight to the source.
Retrieved from CourtListener public records.
| Date | Case | State | The text mentions | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHITFIELD v. PRIME AGENCY No. 2:26-cv-00327 | Pennsylvania | continuing legal education, attorney's fees or costs, a self-represented party, Rule 11 | CourtListener | |
| LIFETIME WELL LLC v. IBSPOT.COM INC. No. 2:25-cv-05135 | Pennsylvania | ChatGPT, Lexis+ AI, a referral to a bar or disciplinary body, continuing legal education | CourtListener | |
| Nora v. M & A Transport No. 5:25-cv-04698 | Pennsylvania | Westlaw AI, a referral to a bar or disciplinary body, continuing legal education, dismissal | CourtListener | |
| BUNCE v. VISUAL TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONS No. 2:23-cv-01740 | Pennsylvania | Rule 11, sanctions, an order to show cause | CourtListener |
More from Pennsylvania, or the whole record of court decisions on AI-hallucinated citations. For the rule this court applies to a filing with AI in it, see the court AI orders tracker.